Blog

Context budgets for production agents

Long prompts feel powerful until costs and latency bite. We treat context like storage: quotas, summaries, and structured handoffs between steps.

AI & agents

AIAgentsArchitecture

Last updated April 7, 20261 min read

Production agents fail quietly when context grows without a plan: irrelevant history drowns the instructions that matter, token bills climb, and latency makes reviewers abandon the tool. The fix is not “smaller model”—it is explicit budgets and structured state.

Carry state in fields, not vibes

We keep durable facts in the workflow record: extracted entities, eligibility flags, and links to source documents. The model sees a bounded packet assembled for the current step—not the entire email thread since 2019.

Summarize only when the schema is stable

Rolling summaries help, but they need validation rules: what must never be dropped, what format downstream tools expect, and when to refuse rather than compress away ambiguity.

Step boundaries are free compression

  • Split classify → draft → verify into separate calls with tight inputs
  • Pass references (IDs, URLs) instead of pasting whole documents twice
  • Log token counts per step so finance and engineering argue with the same numbers

When context is budgeted, agents behave more predictably—and your roadmap shifts from prompt hacks to product design: what belongs in the database, what belongs in the prompt, and what belongs in a human sentence.

Sectors where our systems run

Affordable housing & lotteries
High-volume application intake
E‑commerce & field operations
Defense & regulatory programs
Nonprofits & grant programs
Public-sector digital delivery

Want a comparable outcome?

Start with a short workflow review—we’ll recommend agents, a smart system, or a custom app, and a realistic pilot scope.